H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Jo Durie vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-2

Pam Casale holds a 2–1 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1986 Boca Raton round of 64 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie

GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H

1 – 2

3 main-draw meetings

Pam Casale

USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Jo Durie #21	6-4 7-6	Pam Casale #48	Match data	Feb 12, 1986*	R64	Boca Raton	WTA 250	Hard
Pam Casale	6-2 6-1	Jo Durie	Match data	May 20, 1983*	R16	Berlin Open	WTA 500	Clay
Pam Casale	6-3 6-1	Jo Durie	Match data	Jan 7, 1982*	R32	Washington Open	WTA 500	Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Jo Durie	—	#5	31	2,102	311	263	54.2%	0	0	0	1	8	9
Pam Casale	—	#14	22	1,944	168	147	53.3%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Jo Durie							Pam Casale
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
14	1975	1–1	50.0%	—	1,498	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1976	5–6	45.5%	—	1,503	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1977	11–7	61.1%	—	1,602	0	0	1980	15–10	60.0%	—	1,597	0	0
17	1978	15–9	62.5%	—	1,618	0	1	1981	30–17	63.8%	—	1,811	0	0
18	1979	15–8	65.2%	—	1,713	0	3	1982	20–23	46.5%	—	1,746	0	0
19	1980	21–14	60.0%	—	1,736	0	4	1983	23–20	53.5%	—	1,770	0	0
20	1981	30–14	68.2%	—	1,860	0	7	1984	31–17	64.6%	#15	1,914	0	0
21	1982	25–20	55.6%	—	1,842	0	7	1985	24–20	54.5%	—	1,815	0	0
22	1983	47–18	72.3%	#6	2,095	0	9	1986	16–17	48.5%	#41	1,788	0	0
23	1984	16–15	51.6%	#24	1,891	0	9	1987	5–11	31.2%	#111	1,673	0	0
24	1985	17–19	47.2%	#26	1,800	0	9	1988	4–10	28.6%	#169	1,552	0	0
25	1986	24–17	58.5%	#24	1,842	0	9	1989	0–1	0.0%	#225	1,547	0	0
26	1987	10–17	37.0%	#73	1,742	0	9	1990	0–1	0.0%	—	1,526	0	0
27	1988	19–19	50.0%	#60	1,703	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1989	8–13	38.1%	#117	1,621	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1990	13–13	50.0%	#64	1,673	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1991	15–18	45.5%	#62	1,708	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1992	13–16	44.8%	#59	1,688	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1993	4–12	25.0%	#192	1,563	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1994	1–4	20.0%	#348	1,555	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1995	1–3	25.0%	#292	1,548	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Jo Durie																	Pam Casale
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
14	1975	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1976	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1977	—	—	—	—	5	4	9	55.6%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—	1980	8	7	15	53.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1978	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	1981	17	6	23	73.9%	7	5	12	58.3%	4	3	7	57.1%	2	3	5	40.0%
18	1979	—	—	—	—	6	2	8	75.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1982	2	4	6	33.3%	10	7	17	58.8%	2	2	4	50.0%	6	10	16	37.5%
19	1980	—	—	—	—	13	6	19	68.4%	8	4	12	66.7%	0	4	4	0.0%	1983	5	5	10	50.0%	13	8	21	61.9%	3	3	6	50.0%	2	4	6	33.3%
20	1981	4	2	6	66.7%	7	4	11	63.6%	6	5	11	54.5%	3	3	6	50.0%	1984	8	3	11	72.7%	8	5	13	61.5%	4	3	7	57.1%	11	6	17	64.7%
21	1982	4	3	7	57.1%	5	3	8	62.5%	10	6	16	62.5%	6	8	14	42.9%	1985	17	7	24	70.8%	4	5	9	44.4%	0	3	3	0.0%	3	5	8	37.5%
22	1983	12	3	15	80.0%	9	3	12	75.0%	16	4	20	80.0%	10	8	18	55.6%	1986	3	6	9	33.3%	11	5	16	68.8%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	5	6	16.7%
23	1984	2	4	6	33.3%	2	4	6	33.3%	8	4	12	66.7%	4	3	7	57.1%	1987	3	5	8	37.5%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	2	2	0.0%
24	1985	4	7	11	36.4%	1	3	4	25.0%	9	6	15	60.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	1988	3	6	9	33.3%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
25	1986	10	6	16	62.5%	3	2	5	60.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	7	6	13	53.8%	1989	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1987	3	5	8	37.5%	1	2	3	33.3%	5	5	10	50.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	1990	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1988	9	9	18	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	7	5	12	58.3%	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1989	6	9	15	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1990	6	6	12	50.0%	—	—	—	—	7	4	11	63.6%	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1991	7	9	16	43.8%	0	3	3	0.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1992	3	7	10	30.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	6	3	9	66.7%	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1993	2	4	6	33.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1994	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1995	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	73	75	148	49.3%	57	45	102	55.9%	103	72	175	58.9%	50	65	115	43.5%	—	66	49	115	57.4%	55	41	96	57.3%	15	19	34	44.1%	25	35	60	41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Jo Durie																Pam Casale
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
14	1975	1499	100.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	+0.20	1–0	0–1	—	+0.54	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1976	1503	107.8	—	—	—	—	+73	—	+95	54.2%	+0.71	1–3 (25%)	1–0	—	+3.20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1977	1602	121.7	—	—	—	—	—	-35	+42	56.1%	+0.71	4–1 (80%)	0–1	—	+2.17	1980	1598	118.8	—	—	—	—	+31	—	—	57.4%	+0.72	3–3 (50%)	1–1	—	+2.08
17	1978	1619	121.0	—	—	—	—	+14	—	-9	57.4%	+0.50	5–1 (83%)	1–2 (33%)	104.3	+3.05	1981	1811	140.6	—	—	—	—	-1	-153	-195	64.1%	+1.03	3–6 (33%)	6–0 (100%)	101.9	+2.45
18	1979	1713	129.5	—	—	—	—	—	-74	-93	58.5%	+0.36	6–1 (86%)	6–2 (75%)	110.0	+0.65	1982	1746	140.5	—	—	—	—	-55	-5	-107	50.5%	+0.01	1–8 (11%)	9–5 (64%)	95.6	-2.94
19	1980	1736	123.2	—	—	—	—	-179	-11	-58	61.7%	+0.60	5–8 (38%)	4–1 (80%)	99.6	+0.27	1983	1771	144.3	—	—	—	—	-54	+93	-103	52.1%	+0.47	5–3 (63%)	3–3 (50%)	102.6	-1.30
20	1981	1861	136.4	—	—	—	—	-158	-78	-117	60.8%	+0.60	12–2 (86%)	4–1 (80%)	113.5	-1.05	1984	1915	155.4	—	—	—	—	+5	-61	-210	64.8%	+1.01	3–6 (33%)	7–3 (70%)	100.3	-3.10
21	1982	1843	141.3	—	—	—	—	-59	-76	-39	55.1%	+0.21	8–9 (47%)	2–4 (33%)	97.4	-1.90	1985	1815	137.8	—	—	—	—	+80	-55	-189	53.1%	+0.34	6–4 (60%)	3–3 (50%)	98.8	-1.03
22	1983	2096	160.0	—	—	—	—	-76	-185	-100	69.3%	+1.31	7–5 (58%)	3–2 (60%)	104.6	-5.50	1986	1788	137.2	—	—	—	—	-55	+53	—	46.8%	-0.18	7–4 (64%)	6–3 (67%)	103.8	-3.60
23	1984	1892	136.4	—	—	—	—	+10	-61	+83	49.3%	+0.53	7–4 (64%)	1–5 (17%)	95.2	+0.35	1987	1674	114.3	—	—	—	—	-20	—	-78	41.7%	-0.56	3–5 (38%)	2–1 (67%)	—	-0.56
24	1985	1801	133.4	—	—	—	—	+15	-49	+121	48.8%	+0.06	7–7 (50%)	1–4 (20%)	96.7	-1.39	1988	1552	100.5	—	—	—	—	+26	+207	—	36.4%	-0.79	1–4 (20%)	1–2 (33%)	92.4	+1.02
25	1986	1843	140.1	—	—	—	—	+2	-80	+45	55.7%	+0.21	11–6 (65%)	8–3 (73%)	105.1	-2.77	1989	1547	93.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.50	—	—	—	-0.23
26	1987	1742	134.3	—	—	—	—	+30	-31	+107	41.0%	-0.69	2–5 (29%)	2–2 (50%)	96.4	-2.49	1990	1526	90.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.00	—	—	—	+0.21
27	1988	1703	127.8	—	—	—	—	0	-16	+121	49.4%	-0.10	6–5 (55%)	8–4 (67%)	101.9	-0.25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1989	1622	126.1	—	—	—	—	-7	—	+202	41.3%	-0.67	1–3 (25%)	3–2 (60%)	98.1	+0.33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1990	1674	130.7	—	—	—	—	-60	—	+193	51.7%	+0.48	2–6 (25%)	3–5 (38%)	93.4	+0.04	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1991	1709	132.3	—	—	—	—	+5	-111	+95	45.5%	-0.12	6–7 (46%)	1–2 (33%)	100.5	+1.02	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1992	1689	130.8	—	—	—	—	-48	-50	+163	50.0%	-0.09	3–7 (30%)	4–1 (80%)	99.1	+0.39	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1993	1564	107.8	—	—	—	—	-12	—	—	35.9%	-0.74	3–6 (33%)	0–4 (0%)	92.1	+1.33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1994	1555	106.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	+191	33.3%	-1.42	0–2	—	—	-0.60	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1995	1549	107.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	+141	40.0%	-0.60	0–2	1–0	—	-0.20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	2102	141.8	—	—	—	—	-26	-68	+43	53.6%	+0.27	97–90 (52%)	53–46 (54%)	102.6	-0.49	—	1945	143.6	—	—	—	—	+2	+5	-154	53.9%	+0.36	32–43 (43%)	38–21 (64%)	100.1	-2.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Jo Durie's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Helena Sukova	3	10	13	Aug 14, 1992	H2H
Rosalyn Fairbank	8	5	13	Jul 21, 1990	H2H
Martina Navratilova	0	12	12	Feb 2, 1991	H2H
Pam Shriver	2	9	11	Aug 1, 1991	H2H
Anne Hobbs	4	5	9	May 28, 1986	H2H

Pam Casale's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel	3	7	10	May 10, 1986	H2H
Pilar Vasquez	5	2	7	Apr 6, 1988	H2H
Bonnie Gadusek	0	7	7	Oct 13, 1985	H2H
Bettina Bunge	1	5	6	Feb 19, 1987	H2H
Zina Garrison	3	3	6	Nov 13, 1986	H2H