H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Joannette Kruger vs Jana Nejedly H2H: 1-1
Joannette Kruger and Jana Nejedly are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on clay, while Joannette Kruger leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Nejedly won the 2000 Strasbourg third round 4-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 52
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2000* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Jana Nejedly | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Joannette Kruger | Match data |
| Jan 4, 1996* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Joannette Kruger | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joannette Kruger | #972 | #21 | 1,280 | 1,879 | 147 | 162 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joannette Kruger | Jana Nejedly | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #79 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,791 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #129 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #59 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #46 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #455 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #853 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |