Jodie Burrage
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Korpatsch | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 16, 2024 | H2H |
| Caty Mcnally | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 15, 2025 | H2H |
| Ankita Raina | 2 | 0 | 2 | Oct 19, 2023 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 20, 2023 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Jodie Burrage vs Vania King
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jodie Burrage vs Vania King.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vania King | 7-5 6-4 | Jodie Burrage | Match data | Jun 11, 2016 | Q1 | Birmingham | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Grass |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jodie Burrage | #492 | #85 | 844 | 1,628 | 18 | 26 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,767 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jodie Burrage | Vania King | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2022 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2025 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #261 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jodie Burrage | Vania King | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2011 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2022 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2012 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2023 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2013 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2024 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 2025 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | — | 96 | 109 | 205 | 46.8% | 26 | 36 | 62 | 41.9% | 6 | 15 | 21 | 28.6% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 36/44 of Jodie Burrage's and 237/288 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jodie Burrage | Vania King | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1/2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 63.3% | 52.6% | 36.4% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 46.7% | 33.3% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9/29 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 71.3% | 60.7% | 43.6% | 55.0% | 59.8% | 55.8% | 44.1% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21/36 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 63.7% | 58.9% | 44.6% | 48.9% | 39.1% | 54.0% | 37.7% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 25/26 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 66.0% | 61.8% | 43.9% | 51.8% | 42.8% | 55.6% | 39.5% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 20/23 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 63.1% | 58.0% | 46.4% | 47.2% | 37.3% | 53.7% | 42.1% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 29/31 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 65.9% | 61.5% | 41.9% | 49.4% | 41.0% | 55.1% | 44.8% |
| 22 | 2021 | 4/4 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 57.2% | 63.3% | 29.0% | 32.6% | 46.1% | 49.0% | 39.4% | 2011 | 24/27 | 0.6 | 3.6 | 64.0% | 59.5% | 42.2% | 53.5% | 45.2% | 53.2% | 44.9% |
| 23 | 2022 | 8/8 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 60.2% | 69.2% | 43.0% | 49.1% | 40.7% | 58.5% | 37.0% | 2012 | 33/34 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 64.1% | 62.4% | 47.4% | 51.5% | 43.8% | 57.0% | 43.5% |
| 24 | 2023 | 18/18 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 60.5% | 61.9% | 43.9% | 48.1% | 53.4% | 54.8% | 41.7% | 2013 | 17/19 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 69.2% | 57.3% | 46.4% | 44.7% | 46.8% | 53.7% | 41.1% |
| 25 | 2024 | 4/4 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 64.5% | 63.0% | 43.5% | 61.0% | 54.6% | 56.5% | 43.4% | 2014 | 25/28 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 64.2% | 58.6% | 47.1% | 50.6% | 43.5% | 54.3% | 42.6% |
| 26 | 2025 | 2/10 | 6.5 | 4.0 | 57.1% | 70.4% | 22.3% | 40.2% | 75.0% | 49.9% | 33.2% | 2015 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 61.3% | 55.3% | 33.3% | 16.7% | 50.0% | 46.8% | 39.7% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 24/24 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 63.1% | 64.2% | 43.8% | 58.8% | 50.1% | 56.6% | 44.1% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 70.4% | 50.1% | 40.7% | 56.3% | 55.7% | 48.5% | 38.6% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 4/4 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 60.3% | 52.3% | 38.6% | 54.3% | 41.8% | 47.0% | 40.7% |
| Career | — | 36/44 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 60.3% | 64.3% | 40.8% | 47.6% | 51.1% | 54.9% | 40.1% | — | 237/288 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 65.0% | 60.2% | 44.5% | 51.2% | 44.0% | 54.7% | 42.4% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jodie Burrage | Vania King | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1520 | 103.7 | -0.64 | +0.14 | 0.625 | 40.2% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.17 |
| 17 | 2016 | 1490 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1663 | 131.1 | -1.06 | -0.47 | 0.997 | 50.5% | +24 | — | — | 55.0% | +0.35 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.5 | -0.14 |
| 18 | 2017 | 1474 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1625 | 116.9 | -1.39 | -3.73 | 0.818 | 45.8% | +17 | -157 | +16 | 43.0% | -0.67 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–4 (64%) | 102.4 | -1.23 |
| 19 | 2018 | 1457 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1519 | 117.6 | +0.05 | -3.22 | 0.890 | 47.7% | +49 | -52 | — | 33.9% | -0.89 | 5–7 (42%) | 1–5 (17%) | 94.7 | -1.09 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1592 | 114.9 | -1.54 | -1.39 | 0.910 | 48.1% | +21 | -123 | -33 | 44.9% | -0.45 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.9 | +0.36 |
| 21 | 2020 | 1450 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1598 | 117.8 | -1.20 | +0.84 | 0.997 | 49.8% | +24 | -97 | -78 | 49.3% | -0.17 | 4–9 (31%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.1 | +0.43 |
| 22 | 2021 | 1463 | 104.4 | -3.26 | -1.92 | 0.773 | 44.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.30 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.15 | 2011 | 1691 | 130.5 | -1.09 | +0.98 | 0.960 | 48.9% | -18 | -128 | — | 48.4% | -0.17 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.8 | -1.31 |
| 23 | 2022 | 1531 | 104.8 | +0.38 | -2.94 | 0.892 | 47.8% | — | — | -8 | 47.1% | -0.82 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.10 | 2012 | 1618 | 128.3 | +0.93 | +0.08 | 1.011 | 50.1% | +21 | -46 | — | 48.0% | -0.05 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–3 (63%) | 99.5 | -1.01 |
| 24 | 2023 | 1576 | 112.6 | -0.55 | -1.56 | 0.921 | 48.2% | -79 | — | +84 | 48.8% | -0.49 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.6 | +0.66 | 2013 | 1631 | 118.3 | -0.91 | -1.79 | 0.887 | 47.5% | +1 | -43 | — | 41.7% | -0.79 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–3 (50%) | 103.1 | -0.53 |
| 25 | 2024 | 1595 | 113.2 | -1.05 | -1.76 | 0.997 | 50.0% | -89 | — | — | 55.6% | -0.22 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.31 | 2014 | 1650 | 125.5 | -1.58 | -0.66 | 0.932 | 48.6% | +18 | -55 | -202 | 49.2% | -0.07 | 7–4 (64%) | 3–2 (60%) | 105.8 | -1.14 |
| 26 | 2025 | 1507 | 113.9 | -1.18 | -1.18 | 0.662 | 42.2% | -33 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.87 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | — | -0.36 | 2015 | 1635 | 102.3 | +0.69 | -0.52 | 0.746 | 43.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.02 |
| 27 | 2026 | 1475 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1646 | 125.1 | +0.57 | +0.85 | 1.016 | 50.3% | +12 | -20 | — | 53.7% | +0.11 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–2 (71%) | 102.4 | +0.71 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1593 | 108.4 | -1.97 | -0.89 | 0.750 | 44.4% | +4 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.16 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1560 | 104.4 | -2.66 | -1.04 | 0.768 | 44.2% | +6 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1541 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1628 | 111.8 | -0.74 | -1.91 | 0.889 | 47.5% | -64 | — | +50 | 43.7% | -0.79 | 6–9 (40%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.1 | +0.82 | — | 1767 | 127.9 | -0.67 | -0.74 | 0.935 | 48.6% | +17 | -80 | -68 | 46.2% | -0.31 | 46–50 (48%) | 34–30 (53%) | 104.0 | -1.80 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Vania King
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Hantuchova | 0 | 7 | 7 | Feb 11, 2012 | H2H |
| Marion Bartoli | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 20, 2012 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 9, 2012 | H2H |
| Ana Ivanovic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 21, 2012 | H2H |