H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Johanna Larsson vs Lauren Davis H2H: 1-1
Johanna Larsson and Lauren Davis are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Johanna Larsson leads 1–0 on clay, while Lauren Davis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lauren Davis won the 2019 US Open first round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lauren Davis | 7-5 6-2 | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
| May 24, 2012* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Johanna Larsson | 3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Lauren Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Larsson | #236 | #45 | 1,230 | 1,745 | 153 | 177 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,823 | 140 | 181 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johanna Larsson | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #70 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #75 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2019 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #217 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |