H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Johanna Larsson vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 0-1
Sybille Bammer holds a 1–0 lead over Johanna Larsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sybille Bammer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2011 Indian Wells first round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2011* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Sybille Bammer | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Larsson | #236 | #45 | 1,230 | 1,745 | 153 | 177 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johanna Larsson | Sybille Bammer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #70 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #75 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2019 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #217 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |