H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Judy Tegart vs Janet Newberry H2H: 4-0
Judy Tegart holds a 4–0 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Judy Tegart leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Judy Tegart won the 1972 St. Petersburg fourth round 7-5 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 88
Right-Handed
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1972* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Judy Tegart | 7-5 5-7 7-5 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1971* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Judy Tegart | 6-1 6-4 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Sep 7, 1971* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Judy Tegart | 6-2 6-4 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Jun 6, 1971* | Chichester | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Judy Tegart | 6-1 6-4 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judy Tegart | — | — | — | 2,055 | 281 | 141 | 66.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judy Tegart | Janet Newberry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1968 | 69–21 | 76.7% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1969 | 54–21 | 72.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1970 | 45–24 | 65.2% | — | 1,926 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1971 | 55–32 | 63.2% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1972 | 27–25 | 51.9% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1974 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1975 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1978 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 1981 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |