H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 3-2

Julia Goerges holds a 3–2 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2012 Indian Wells third round 6-3 6-4.

GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 8, 2012* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Julia Goerges #15 6-3 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #26 Match data
Jun 22, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Julia Goerges #16 6-3 6-0 Anabel Medina Garrigues #43 Match data
Feb 25, 2011* Acapulco WTA 250 R16 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #92 6-4 7-6(6) Julia Goerges #34 Match data
Jan 6, 2011* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Julia Goerges #40 6-4 6-0 Anabel Medina Garrigues #71 Match data
Jul 26, 2008* Portoroz WTA 250 SF Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #32 6-3 2-6 6-4 Julia Goerges #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,940 304 249 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Julia Goerges Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,588 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,772 0 2 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,751 0 2 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,535 0 2 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,596 0 2 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,612 0 2 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,671 0 2 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
2017 42–22 65.6% #14 1,880 0 4 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
2018 44–22 66.7% #14 1,861 0 6 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,799 0 7 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,761 0 7 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11