H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Aravane Rezai H2H: 1-0
Julia Goerges holds a 1–0 lead over Aravane Rezai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2012 Barcelona third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2012* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-4 6-0 | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Aravane Rezai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |