H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Carla Suárez Navarro H2H: 2-1
Julia Goerges holds a 2–1 lead over Carla Suárez Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Carla Suárez Navarro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2017 Miami second round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 37
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-4 7-6(5) | Carla Suárez Navarro | Match data |
| May 7, 2015* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Carla Suárez Navarro | 6-3 7-5 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2010* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 6-1 | Carla Suárez Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | #342 | #6 | 4,015 | 2,022 | 339 | 247 | 57.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Carla Suárez Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #17 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |