H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Elena Baltacha H2H: 2-1
Julia Goerges holds a 2–1 lead over Elena Baltacha in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2012 Indian Wells second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2012* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-2 | Elena Baltacha | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2011* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 7-5 6-1 | Elena Baltacha | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2011* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Elena Baltacha | 2-6 7-5 7-6(2) | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Elena Baltacha | #225 | #49 | 1,179 | 1,664 | 47 | 74 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Elena Baltacha | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #51 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #174 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |