H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Elena Vesnina H2H: 2-3

Elena Vesnina holds a 3–2 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Elena Vesnina leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2016 Moscow second round 7-5 5-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julia Goerges
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Elena Vesnina
RUS Age 40 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julia Goerges #64 7-5 5-0 (ret.) Elena Vesnina #19 Match data Oct 19, 2016 R16 Moscow Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Julia Goerges #102 5-7 6-3 6-3 Elena Vesnina #33 Match data Feb 1, 2014* QF Pattaya International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Elena Vesnina #56 2-6 6-2 6-2 Julia Goerges #35 Match data Apr 9, 2011* QF Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Elena Vesnina #33 6-3 6-2 Julia Goerges #71 Match data Apr 9, 2010* R16 Ponte Vedra Beach International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Elena Vesnina #34 6-3 6-4 Julia Goerges #67 Match data Mar 26, 2010* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,945 311 251 55.3% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Elena Vesnina #573 #13 3,320 1,855 263 261 50.2% 0 1 0 1 1 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julia Goerges Elena Vesnina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #259 1,485 0 0
18 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 2005 6–6 50.0% #106 1,512 0 0
19 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2006 20–24 45.5% #47 1,617 0 0
20 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,589 0 0 2007 17–21 44.7% #54 1,631 0 0
21 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2008 12–19 38.7% #79 1,559 0 0
22 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,773 0 2 2009 31–20 60.8% #23 1,769 0 0
23 2012 36–26 58.1% #18 1,761 0 2 2010 22–22 50.0% #52 1,722 0 0
24 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,543 0 2 2011 19–21 47.5% #57 1,665 0 0
25 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,587 0 2 2012 14–17 45.2% #68 1,697 0 0
26 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,609 0 2 2013 30–19 61.2% #25 1,802 0 2
27 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,668 0 2 2014 16–17 48.5% #64 1,691 0 2
28 2017 46–22 67.6% #14 1,892 0 4 2015 11–17 39.3% #115 1,611 0 2
29 2018 45–23 66.2% #14 1,871 0 6 2016 28–17 62.2% #16 1,767 0 2
30 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,802 0 7 2017 25–25 50.0% #18 1,702 0 3
31 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,763 0 7 2018 8–11 42.1% #137 1,685 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2021 4–4 50.0% #310 1,683 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julia Goerges Elena Vesnina
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2008 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 12 14 26 46.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2009 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 11 12 23 47.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2010 16 14 30 53.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 9 12 21 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 18 12 30 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2013 7 16 23 30.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2014 10 10 20 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2015 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 22 13 35 62.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
27 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 7 9 16 43.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2017 35 13 48 72.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2018 28 14 42 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2016 11 11 22 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
30 2019 19 12 31 61.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2017 20 17 37 54.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2018 5 7 12 41.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 197 156 353 55.8% 86 73 159 54.1% 26 20 46 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — 157 160 317 49.5% 71 73 144 49.3% 33 24 57 57.9% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 524/562 of Julia Goerges's and 450/511 of Elena Vesnina's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Julia Goerges Elena Vesnina
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2007 6/9 2.7 3.3 54.7% 64.8% 42.0% 59.6% 55.1% 54.0% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 11/13 5.1 5.3 59.1% 67.7% 46.8% 52.0% 47.2% 59.3% 39.2% 2006 26/44 1.7 5.1 61.8% 59.6% 48.5% 51.3% 46.9% 55.1% 42.8%
20 2009 19/20 5.2 2.4 60.4% 68.6% 50.1% 58.4% 43.6% 61.4% 40.4% 2007 28/38 1.8 4.3 58.7% 62.6% 44.0% 50.2% 48.9% 54.9% 40.8%
21 2010 49/51 4.2 3.5 61.2% 66.7% 45.8% 58.1% 48.1% 58.5% 43.3% 2008 28/31 2.8 5.0 61.2% 59.1% 42.8% 52.2% 49.7% 53.0% 44.3%
22 2011 59/60 4.1 2.7 58.4% 70.4% 49.1% 52.6% 48.8% 61.3% 43.2% 2009 47/51 3.0 4.4 61.7% 64.1% 45.6% 51.2% 46.2% 56.9% 45.6%
23 2012 56/62 3.9 2.9 57.7% 67.0% 48.1% 54.3% 47.8% 59.1% 43.6% 2010 42/44 2.3 3.5 62.8% 64.3% 47.1% 51.9% 44.2% 57.9% 44.1%
24 2013 40/41 4.5 4.0 55.6% 66.4% 44.5% 53.8% 46.9% 56.5% 40.0% 2011 38/40 2.1 4.0 63.5% 60.4% 44.4% 46.8% 48.1% 54.3% 45.6%
25 2014 31/33 6.1 4.1 59.2% 68.5% 48.8% 54.2% 44.2% 60.3% 42.5% 2012 30/31 2.0 3.5 64.9% 62.1% 44.5% 45.7% 50.9% 56.0% 42.3%
26 2015 30/37 4.7 2.5 60.0% 67.8% 47.7% 49.3% 50.2% 59.9% 40.7% 2013 43/49 2.0 3.5 64.0% 64.2% 43.7% 56.0% 51.2% 56.8% 45.8%
27 2016 36/42 5.0 3.4 56.9% 71.9% 49.2% 58.3% 41.9% 61.9% 40.6% 2014 29/33 2.4 4.3 61.2% 59.5% 47.6% 50.9% 48.2% 54.8% 43.1%
28 2017 64/68 5.8 3.4 57.0% 72.1% 49.1% 56.1% 50.6% 62.3% 42.7% 2015 22/28 2.5 4.5 64.1% 63.6% 46.8% 50.6% 46.0% 57.8% 41.1%
29 2018 65/68 7.4 3.7 57.7% 74.7% 49.3% 59.1% 42.7% 63.9% 39.5% 2016 43/45 2.7 3.0 63.9% 62.4% 48.1% 53.2% 47.4% 57.3% 44.9%
30 2019 46/46 6.7 4.1 55.4% 73.0% 48.9% 58.3% 42.8% 62.1% 40.8% 2017 50/50 2.4 4.0 62.4% 63.6% 46.7% 55.5% 48.7% 57.1% 43.3%
31 2020 12/12 6.6 3.5 56.8% 70.9% 47.8% 60.1% 48.8% 61.0% 40.5% 2018 19/19 1.8 3.3 59.8% 62.3% 46.2% 59.4% 42.2% 55.8% 42.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 5/8 3.8 2.0 63.9% 65.1% 52.4% 56.3% 51.7% 60.2% 40.4%
Career — 524/562 5.3 3.4 57.9% 70.0% 48.1% 55.9% 46.6% 60.7% 41.6% — 450/524 2.3 3.9 62.5% 62.4% 45.9% 52.0% 47.8% 56.2% 43.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julia Goerges Elena Vesnina
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1485 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06
18 2007 1544 122.1 +0.76 +0.36 0.884 47.2% +9 — — 40.0% -0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18 2005 1512 111.3 — — — — +18 +11 — 53.6% +0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.78
19 2008 1558 111.9 +1.60 -1.77 0.961 49.2% +4 — — 46.7% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.66 2006 1617 126.3 -0.84 -1.03 0.952 48.9% -20 -59 -4 45.6% -0.31 10–11 (48%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.40
20 2009 1590 119.7 +2.92 -2.21 1.046 50.8% -1 -63 +41 50.0% +0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.08 2007 1632 116.4 -0.58 -2.70 0.905 48.1% -18 -83 +38 45.8% -0.52 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.91
21 2010 1761 134.3 +2.06 +0.13 1.043 51.0% -59 -53 — 54.7% +0.42 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.65 2008 1559 120.2 -1.61 -0.27 0.943 48.7% +44 -54 +62 40.0% -0.80 7–6 (54%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.31
22 2011 1774 141.6 +5.63 -0.14 1.115 52.1% -57 +89 -162 55.6% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 4–11 (27%) — -1.13 2009 1769 139.8 +1.52 +2.06 1.060 51.2% -22 -132 -92 56.4% +0.36 13–6 (68%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.62
23 2012 1761 139.8 +2.73 +0.03 1.067 51.4% +21 +17 -68 55.1% +0.34 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) — -0.26 2010 1722 133.3 +1.99 +0.53 1.050 50.9% +24 -115 — 51.5% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.78
24 2013 1544 119.3 +0.51 -3.35 0.920 48.5% +41 +130 — 40.4% -0.70 5–10 (33%) 2–7 (22%) — +1.42 2011 1666 128.4 -0.70 +1.97 0.998 49.9% -46 +18 — 48.2% +0.06 6–5 (55%) 2–9 (18%) — -0.40
25 2014 1588 128.4 +3.16 -0.41 1.070 51.1% +14 +50 — 51.2% +0.09 4–14 (22%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.01 2012 1698 129.1 +0.84 +0.09 0.961 49.2% -74 +10 -44 45.3% -0.45 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) — -2.98
26 2015 1610 130.1 +1.79 -0.65 1.013 50.5% -4 +23 — 47.6% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.01 2013 1803 145.9 +1.77 +2.37 1.059 51.3% -28 -167 -11 56.8% +0.55 12–5 (71%) 5–3 (63%) — -2.82
27 2016 1668 133.2 +4.47 -2.01 1.064 51.3% 0 +4 — 52.2% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.80 2014 1691 123.1 -1.11 -0.16 0.953 49.1% +9 -36 +78 48.7% -0.21 7–5 (58%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.88
28 2017 1893 143.8 +5.05 -0.79 1.134 52.4% +26 -228 -276 66.4% +0.92 12–7 (63%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.01 2015 1612 121.6 -0.23 -1.00 0.974 49.4% +14 +26 — 41.5% -0.49 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.02
29 2018 1872 146.7 +6.30 -1.90 1.092 51.6% +1 -125 -90 62.3% +0.73 16–8 (67%) 14–7 (67%) — -0.46 2016 1768 136.6 +1.65 +2.12 1.053 51.1% -87 -6 +106 58.0% +0.37 8–4 (67%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.78
30 2019 1802 139.1 +4.10 -1.39 1.079 51.4% +14 -176 +70 56.9% +0.57 10–6 (63%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.72 2017 1703 142.6 +0.55 +0.53 1.010 50.2% +15 +11 +176 50.0% +0.24 9–6 (60%) 2–8 (20%) — +1.55
31 2020 1764 128.3 +1.47 -1.09 1.038 50.8% +27 -153 — 50.0% +0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.07 2018 1686 126.3 -0.27 -0.49 0.954 49.3% +7 -3 — 44.2% -0.49 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.52
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1683 111.9 +1.14 +0.26 1.014 49.6% — -35 — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — +0.15
Career — 1945 141.6 +3.69 -1.05 1.060 51.2% +1 -18 -76 54.8% +0.37 95–87 (52%) 68–83 (45%) 95.2 -0.51 — 1856 136.9 +0.46 +0.60 1.000 50.0% -13 -43 +33 49.5% -0.03 90–75 (55%) 52–64 (45%) 102.6 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.