H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Elena Vesnina H2H: 2-3

Elena Vesnina holds a 3–2 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Elena Vesnina leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2016 Moscow fourth round 7-5 5-0.

GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 19, 2016 Moscow WTA 500 R16 Hard Julia Goerges #64 7-5 5-0 (ret.) Elena Vesnina #19 Match data
Feb 1, 2014* Pattaya WTA 250 QF Hard Julia Goerges #102 5-7 6-3 6-3 Elena Vesnina #33 Match data
Apr 9, 2011* Charleston WTA 500 QF Clay Elena Vesnina #56 2-6 6-2 6-2 Julia Goerges #35 Match data
Apr 9, 2010* Ponte Vedra Beach WTA 250 R16 Clay Elena Vesnina #33 6-3 6-2 Julia Goerges #71 Match data
Mar 24, 2010* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Elena Vesnina #34 6-3 6-4 Julia Goerges #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,940 304 249 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Elena Vesnina #573 #13 3,320 1,858 262 260 50.2% 0 1 0 1 1 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Julia Goerges Elena Vesnina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #259 1,485 0 0
2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2005 6–6 50.0% #106 1,511 0 0
2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,588 0 0 2006 20–24 45.5% #47 1,617 0 0
2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2007 17–21 44.7% #54 1,631 0 0
2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,772 0 2 2008 12–19 38.7% #79 1,558 0 0
2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,751 0 2 2009 31–20 60.8% #23 1,767 0 0
2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,535 0 2 2010 22–22 50.0% #52 1,720 0 0
2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,596 0 2 2011 19–21 47.5% #57 1,689 0 0
2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,612 0 2 2012 14–17 45.2% #68 1,701 0 0
2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,671 0 2 2013 30–19 61.2% #25 1,801 0 2
2017 42–22 65.6% #14 1,880 0 4 2014 16–17 48.5% #64 1,689 0 2
2018 44–22 66.7% #14 1,861 0 6 2015 11–17 39.3% #115 1,609 0 2
2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,799 0 7 2016 28–16 63.6% #16 1,778 0 2
2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,761 0 7 2017 25–26 49.0% #18 1,691 0 3
2018 8–11 42.1% #137 1,679 0 3
2021 3–3 50.0% #310 1,689 0 3