H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Evgeniya Rodina H2H: 1-1
Julia Goerges and Evgeniya Rodina are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on grass, while Evgeniya Rodina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2019 Birmingham fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2019* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Julia Goerges | 6-4 6-3 | Evgeniya Rodina | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2011* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Evgeniya Rodina | 6-3 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Evgeniya Rodina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |