H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 0-3
Flavia Pennetta holds a 3–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Flavia Pennetta leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Flavia Pennetta won the 2015 Dubai second round 2-6 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2015* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jul 17, 2010* | Palermo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Flavia Pennetta | 6-0 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Flavia Pennetta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 |