H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 2-4

Jelena Jankovic holds a 4–2 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2017 Rome third round 2-6 7-6(2) 6-1.

GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 18, 2017* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Julia Goerges #45 2-6 7-6(2) 6-1 Jelena Jankovic #63 Match data
Jan 19, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jelena Jankovic #54 6-3 6-4 Julia Goerges #57 Match data
Jan 12, 2012* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Jelena Jankovic #14 6-1 3-1 (ret.) Julia Goerges #23 Match data
Aug 8, 2011 Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Julia Goerges #20 6-1 6-3 Jelena Jankovic #14 Match data
Mar 10, 2011* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Jelena Jankovic #6 6-2 6-4 Julia Goerges #35 Match data
Jun 24, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jelena Jankovic #6 6-4 7-6(0) Julia Goerges #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,940 304 249 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Julia Goerges Jelena Jankovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0
2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0
2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,588 0 0 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0
2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1
2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,772 0 2 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1
2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,751 0 2 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1
2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,535 0 2 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5
2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,596 0 2 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9
2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,612 0 2 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11
2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,671 0 2 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12
2017 42–22 65.6% #14 1,880 0 4 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12
2018 44–22 66.7% #14 1,861 0 6 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12
2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,799 0 7 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13
2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,761 0 7 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13
2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15
2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15
2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15