H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Jie Zheng H2H: 1-2
Jie Zheng holds a 2–1 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jie Zheng leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2013 Australian Open third round 6-3 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 1-6 7-5 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2011* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jie Zheng | 6-2 1-6 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2009* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jie Zheng | 6-4 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Jie Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |