H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Karin Knapp H2H: 2-1
Julia Goerges holds a 2–1 lead over Karin Knapp in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2016 Bastad quarterfinal 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2016* | Bastad | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Julia Goerges | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Karin Knapp | Match data |
| Jan 2, 2014* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(2) | Karin Knapp | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2008* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Karin Knapp | 6-1 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Karin Knapp | #971 | #33 | 1,420 | 1,712 | 103 | 117 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Karin Knapp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #41 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #51 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #147 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #966 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |