H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 2-0
Julia Goerges holds a 2–0 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2008 Portoroz fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2008* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-4 6-2 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Julia Goerges | 4-6 7-6(6) 16-14 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |