H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 2-2
Julia Goerges and Kiki Bertens are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kiki Bertens leads 2–0 on clay, while Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2019 US Open third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 6-3 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Julia Goerges | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2018* | Charleston | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 6-2 6-1 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| May 21, 2016* | Nurnberg | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |