H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 2-0
Julia Goerges holds a 2–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2009 Quebec City quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2009* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 6-4 | Lilia Osterloh | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2008* | Memphis | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | Lilia Osterloh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Lilia Osterloh | #1,223 | #41 | 738 | 1,697 | 83 | 138 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Lilia Osterloh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #79 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #43 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #156 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #119 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #144 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #230 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #237 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |