H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 4-2

Julia Goerges holds a 4–2 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2018 Montreal third round 2-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julia Goerges
GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 2018* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Julia Goerges #10 2-6 6-4 6-3 Lucie Safarova #58 Match data
Feb 14, 2018* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Julia Goerges #10 6-1 7-5 Lucie Safarova #31 Match data
Jun 25, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Lucie Safarova #23 7-6(3) 7-6(3) Julia Goerges #99 Match data
May 25, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Julia Goerges #18 2-6 7-5 6-2 Lucie Safarova #37 Match data
Mar 9, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Julia Goerges #69 7-5 3-6 6-3 Lucie Safarova #39 Match data
Sep 19, 2009* Quebec City WTA 250 SF Hard Lucie Safarova #50 6-3 6-2 Julia Goerges #91 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,940 304 249 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Julia Goerges Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2
2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,588 0 0 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3
2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4
2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,772 0 2 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4
2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,751 0 2 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4
2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,535 0 2 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4
2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,596 0 2 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4
2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,612 0 2 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5
2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,671 0 2 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
2017 42–22 65.6% #14 1,880 0 4 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
2018 44–22 66.7% #14 1,861 0 6 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,799 0 7 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,761 0 7 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7