H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Mariana Duque-Mariño H2H: 0-2
Mariana Duque-Mariño holds a 2–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mariana Duque-Mariño leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mariana Duque-Mariño won the 2017 Madrid second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2017 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mariana Duque-Mariño | 6-3 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Mariana Duque-Mariño | 6-4 6-7(3) 7-5 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Mariana Duque-Mariño | #709 | #66 | 923 | 1,657 | 48 | 82 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Mariana Duque-Mariño | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #109 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #192 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,453 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,439 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #145 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,454 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #78 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #110 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #107 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |