H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 1-0
Julia Goerges holds a 1–0 lead over Michaella Krajicek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2011 Stuttgart third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2011* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-1 | Michaella Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Michaella Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |