H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Mona Barthel H2H: 1-2
Mona Barthel holds a 2–1 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mona Barthel won the 2019 Indian Wells third round 7-5 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mona Barthel | 7-5 1-6 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jan 4, 2019* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-4 6-4 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| May 9, 2012* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mona Barthel | 6-4 6-1 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Mona Barthel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |