H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Shuai Peng H2H: 0-1

Shuai Peng holds a 1–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shuai Peng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2011 US Open round of 32 6-4 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julia Goerges
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Peng #14 6-4 7-6(1) Julia Goerges #21 Match data Sep 4, 2011* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,945 311 251 55.3% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julia Goerges Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0
20 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,589 0 0 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0
21 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0
22 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,773 0 2 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0
23 2012 36–26 58.1% #18 1,761 0 2 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0
24 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,543 0 2 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0
25 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,587 0 2 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0
26 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,609 0 2 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0
27 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,668 0 2 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0
28 2017 46–22 67.6% #14 1,892 0 4 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0
29 2018 45–23 66.2% #14 1,871 0 6 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0
30 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,802 0 7 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1
31 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,763 0 7 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julia Goerges Shuai Peng
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2008 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2009 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2010 16 14 30 53.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2013 7 16 23 30.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2014 10 10 20 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
26 2015 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2017 35 13 48 72.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2018 28 14 42 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2019 19 12 31 61.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 197 156 353 55.8% 86 73 159 54.1% 26 20 46 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 524/562 of Julia Goerges's and 451/553 of Shuai Peng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Julia Goerges Shuai Peng
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2007 6/9 2.7 3.3 54.7% 64.8% 42.0% 59.6% 55.1% 54.0% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 11/13 5.1 5.3 59.1% 67.7% 46.8% 52.0% 47.2% 59.3% 39.2% 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0%
20 2009 19/20 5.2 2.4 60.4% 68.6% 50.1% 58.4% 43.6% 61.4% 40.4% 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0%
21 2010 49/51 4.2 3.5 61.2% 66.7% 45.8% 58.1% 48.1% 58.5% 43.3% 2007 30/36 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5%
22 2011 59/60 4.1 2.7 58.4% 70.4% 49.1% 52.6% 48.8% 61.3% 43.2% 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4%
23 2012 56/62 3.9 2.9 57.7% 67.0% 48.1% 54.3% 47.8% 59.1% 43.6% 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5%
24 2013 40/41 4.5 4.0 55.6% 66.4% 44.5% 53.8% 46.9% 56.5% 40.0% 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3%
25 2014 31/33 6.1 4.1 59.2% 68.5% 48.8% 54.2% 44.2% 60.3% 42.5% 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7%
26 2015 30/37 4.7 2.5 60.0% 67.8% 47.7% 49.3% 50.2% 59.9% 40.7% 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4%
27 2016 36/42 5.0 3.4 56.9% 71.9% 49.2% 58.3% 41.9% 61.9% 40.6% 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7%
28 2017 64/68 5.8 3.4 57.0% 72.1% 49.1% 56.1% 50.6% 62.3% 42.7% 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3%
29 2018 65/68 7.4 3.7 57.7% 74.7% 49.3% 59.1% 42.7% 63.9% 39.5% 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2%
30 2019 46/46 6.7 4.1 55.4% 73.0% 48.9% 58.3% 42.8% 62.1% 40.8% 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8%
31 2020 12/12 6.6 3.5 56.8% 70.9% 47.8% 60.1% 48.8% 61.0% 40.5% 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9%
Career — 524/562 5.3 3.4 57.9% 70.0% 48.1% 55.9% 46.6% 60.7% 41.6% — 451/566 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.4% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julia Goerges Shuai Peng
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22
18 2007 1544 122.1 +0.76 +0.36 0.884 47.2% +9 — — 40.0% -0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25
19 2008 1558 111.9 +1.60 -1.77 0.961 49.2% +4 — — 46.7% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.66 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12
20 2009 1590 119.7 +2.92 -2.21 1.046 50.8% -1 -63 +41 50.0% +0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 -0.08 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81
21 2010 1761 134.3 +2.06 +0.13 1.043 51.0% -59 -53 — 54.7% +0.42 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 104.4 -1.65 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16
22 2011 1774 141.6 +5.63 -0.14 1.115 52.1% -57 +89 -162 55.6% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 4–11 (27%) 98.6 -1.13 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57
23 2012 1761 139.8 +2.73 +0.03 1.067 51.4% +21 +17 -68 55.1% +0.34 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) 100.1 -0.26 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70
24 2013 1544 119.3 +0.51 -3.35 0.920 48.5% +41 +130 — 40.4% -0.70 5–10 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 89.5 +1.42 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67
25 2014 1588 128.4 +3.16 -0.41 1.070 51.1% +14 +50 — 51.2% +0.09 4–14 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 89.3 -1.01 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38
26 2015 1610 130.1 +1.79 -0.65 1.013 50.5% -4 +23 — 47.6% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.9 -0.01 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22
27 2016 1668 133.2 +4.47 -2.01 1.064 51.3% 0 +4 — 52.2% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.7 -0.80 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24
28 2017 1893 143.8 +5.08 -0.79 1.134 52.4% +26 -228 -276 66.4% +0.92 12–7 (63%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.01 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27
29 2018 1872 146.7 +6.30 -1.90 1.092 51.6% +1 -125 -90 62.3% +0.73 16–8 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 107.5 -0.46 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 2019 1802 139.1 +4.10 -1.39 1.079 51.4% +14 -176 +70 56.9% +0.57 10–6 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 95.7 +0.72 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09
31 2020 1764 128.3 +1.47 -1.09 1.038 50.8% +27 -153 — 50.0% +0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.07 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30
Career — 1945 141.6 +3.70 -1.05 1.060 51.2% +1 -18 -76 54.8% +0.37 95–87 (52%) 68–83 (45%) 95.2 -0.51 — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.