H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Sílvia Soler-Espinosa H2H: 1-2
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa holds a 2–1 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sílvia Soler-Espinosa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sílvia Soler-Espinosa won the 2014 Bastad fourth round 4-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2014* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2012* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 6-1 | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2012* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | 1-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | #858 | #54 | 1,157 | 1,643 | 56 | 102 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #66 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #145 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #681 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |