H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Vania King H2H: 1-0

Julia Goerges holds a 1–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2012 China Open round of 64 6-7(9) 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julia Goerges
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julia Goerges #21 6-7(9) 7-5 6-2 Vania King #67 Match data Oct 3, 2012* R64 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,945 311 251 55.3% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julia Goerges Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1
19 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1
20 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,589 0 0 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1
21 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1
22 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,773 0 2 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1
23 2012 36–26 58.1% #18 1,761 0 2 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1
24 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,543 0 2 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,587 0 2 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,609 0 2 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,668 0 2 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2017 46–22 67.6% #14 1,892 0 4 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 2018 45–23 66.2% #14 1,871 0 6 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1
30 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,802 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,763 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julia Goerges Vania King
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 2008 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 2009 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2010 16 14 30 53.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2013 7 16 23 30.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2014 10 10 20 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2015 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2017 35 13 48 72.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 28 14 42 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2019 19 12 31 61.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 197 156 353 55.8% 86 73 159 54.1% 26 20 46 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 524/562 of Julia Goerges's and 237/288 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Julia Goerges Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 2007 6/9 2.7 3.3 54.7% 64.8% 42.0% 59.6% 55.1% 54.0% 40.7% 2007 21/36 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 2008 11/13 5.1 5.3 59.1% 67.7% 46.8% 52.0% 47.2% 59.3% 39.2% 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 2009 19/20 5.2 2.4 60.4% 68.6% 50.1% 58.4% 43.6% 61.4% 40.4% 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 2010 49/51 4.2 3.5 61.2% 66.7% 45.8% 58.1% 48.1% 58.5% 43.3% 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 2011 59/60 4.1 2.7 58.4% 70.4% 49.1% 52.6% 48.8% 61.3% 43.2% 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 2012 56/62 3.9 2.9 57.7% 67.0% 48.1% 54.3% 47.8% 59.1% 43.6% 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2013 40/41 4.5 4.0 55.6% 66.4% 44.5% 53.8% 46.9% 56.5% 40.0% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2014 31/33 6.1 4.1 59.2% 68.5% 48.8% 54.2% 44.2% 60.3% 42.5% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2015 30/37 4.7 2.5 60.0% 67.8% 47.7% 49.3% 50.2% 59.9% 40.7% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 2016 36/42 5.0 3.4 56.9% 71.9% 49.2% 58.3% 41.9% 61.9% 40.6% 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2017 64/68 5.8 3.4 57.0% 72.1% 49.1% 56.1% 50.6% 62.3% 42.7% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 2018 65/68 7.4 3.7 57.7% 74.7% 49.3% 59.1% 42.7% 63.9% 39.5% 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
30 2019 46/46 6.7 4.1 55.4% 73.0% 48.9% 58.3% 42.8% 62.1% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 12/12 6.6 3.5 56.8% 70.9% 47.8% 60.1% 48.8% 61.0% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 524/562 5.3 3.4 57.9% 70.0% 48.1% 55.9% 46.6% 60.7% 41.6% — 237/288 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julia Goerges Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 2007 1544 122.1 +0.76 +0.36 0.884 47.2% +9 — — 40.0% -0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +16 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.4 -1.23
19 2008 1558 111.9 +1.60 -1.77 0.961 49.2% +4 — — 46.7% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.66 2008 1519 117.6 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -1.09
20 2009 1590 119.7 +2.92 -2.21 1.046 50.8% -1 -63 +41 50.0% +0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 -0.08 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.36
21 2010 1761 134.3 +2.06 +0.13 1.043 51.0% -59 -53 — 54.7% +0.42 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 104.4 -1.65 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.43
22 2011 1774 141.6 +5.63 -0.14 1.115 52.1% -57 +89 -162 55.6% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 4–11 (27%) 98.6 -1.13 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 2012 1761 139.8 +2.73 +0.03 1.067 51.4% +21 +17 -68 55.1% +0.34 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) 100.1 -0.26 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -46 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2013 1544 119.3 +0.51 -3.35 0.920 48.5% +41 +130 — 40.4% -0.70 5–10 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 89.5 +1.42 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2014 1588 128.4 +3.16 -0.41 1.070 51.1% +14 +50 — 51.2% +0.09 4–14 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 89.3 -1.01 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +18 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2015 1610 130.1 +1.79 -0.65 1.013 50.5% -4 +23 — 47.6% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.9 -0.01 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
27 2016 1668 133.2 +4.47 -2.01 1.064 51.3% 0 +4 — 52.2% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.7 -0.80 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2017 1893 143.8 +5.08 -0.79 1.134 52.4% +26 -228 -276 66.4% +0.92 12–7 (63%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.01 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16
29 2018 1872 146.7 +6.30 -1.90 1.092 51.6% +1 -125 -90 62.3% +0.73 16–8 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 107.5 -0.46 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +6 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17
30 2019 1802 139.1 +4.10 -1.39 1.079 51.4% +14 -176 +70 56.9% +0.57 10–6 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 95.7 +0.72 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 1764 128.3 +1.47 -1.09 1.038 50.8% +27 -153 — 50.0% +0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1945 141.6 +3.70 -1.05 1.060 51.2% +1 -18 -76 54.8% +0.37 95–87 (52%) 68–83 (45%) 95.2 -0.51 — 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +17 -80 -68 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 104.0 -1.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.