H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 2-3
Yanina Wickmayer holds a 3–2 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Yanina Wickmayer leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2017 Budapest quarterfinal 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2017* | Budapest | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-1 7-5 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-2 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-4 7-5 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2010* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-2 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2010* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-3 7-5 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Yanina Wickmayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 |