H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Julia Schruff vs Emma Laine H2H: 3-0
Julia Schruff holds a 3–0 lead over Emma Laine in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Schruff leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Schruff won the 2006 Bangkok third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FIN
Age 40
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006* | Bangkok | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Julia Schruff | 6-4 7-6(5) | Emma Laine | Match data |
| May 25, 2006* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Julia Schruff | 6-2 6-4 | Emma Laine | Match data |
| May 10, 2006* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Julia Schruff | 6-1 6-4 | Emma Laine | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Schruff | #1,200 | #52 | 536 | 1,665 | 48 | 80 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emma Laine | #1,001 | #50 | 429 | 1,578 | 21 | 38 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julia Schruff | Emma Laine | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #843 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #74 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #81 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #119 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #132 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #131 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |