H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Julia Schruff holds a 3–0 lead over Emma Laine in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Schruff leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Schruff won the 2006 Bangkok round of 32 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Schruff | 6-4 7-6(5) | Emma Laine | Match data | Oct 12, 2006* | R32 | Bangkok | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Julia Schruff | 6-2 6-4 | Emma Laine | Match data | May 25, 2006* | R32 | Strasbourg Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
| Julia Schruff | 6-1 6-4 | Emma Laine | Match data | May 10, 2006* | R64 | Berlin Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Schruff | #1,200 | #52 | 536 | 1,663 | 48 | 80 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emma Laine | #1,001 | #50 | 429 | 1,577 | 21 | 38 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julia Schruff | Emma Laine | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #843 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #74 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #81 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #119 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #131 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Julia Schruff | Emma Laine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2006 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 24 | 38 | 62 | 38.7% | 24 | 36 | 60 | 40.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | 20 | 28 | 48 | 41.7% | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 58/128 of Julia Schruff's and 29/55 of Emma Laine's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Julia Schruff | Emma Laine | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2/10 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 70.3% | 49.9% | 50.0% | 43.9% | 23.1% | 50.0% | 40.0% |
| 20 | 2003 | 1/9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 82.0% | 47.6% | 66.7% | 57.1% | 36.4% | 51.0% | 43.8% | 2006 | 18/35 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 60.4% | 63.3% | 43.0% | 52.2% | 48.3% | 56.3% | 44.5% |
| 21 | 2004 | 3/17 | 7.7 | 3.3 | 59.0% | 61.3% | 45.7% | 48.0% | 59.7% | 55.0% | 45.7% | 2007 | 7/8 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 59.5% | 57.7% | 41.8% | 52.4% | 55.2% | 50.8% | 41.0% |
| 22 | 2005 | 6/22 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 58.1% | 62.4% | 41.7% | 49.1% | 41.1% | 53.8% | 40.8% | 2008 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 45.7% | 60.6% | 41.0% | 56.3% | 50.0% | 49.4% | 44.3% |
| 23 | 2006 | 19/42 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 63.1% | 58.9% | 40.7% | 50.4% | 44.7% | 52.3% | 42.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 14/19 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 63.8% | 54.2% | 49.1% | 50.8% | 53.8% | 51.9% | 47.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 9/12 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 61.8% | 54.4% | 37.0% | 51.3% | 44.7% | 47.5% | 46.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 4/5 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 62.1% | 50.2% | 42.1% | 50.5% | 54.6% | 47.2% | 46.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 47.2% | 52.9% | 47.1% | 52.3% | 63.6% | 50.2% | 31.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 58/128 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 62.0% | 56.6% | 43.3% | 50.6% | 48.5% | 51.3% | 44.1% | — | 29/59 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 59.9% | 60.8% | 43.1% | 52.0% | 48.3% | 54.1% | 43.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Julia Schruff | Emma Laine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1487 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1472 | 93.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.10 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1490 | 103.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.24 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1505 | 106.3 | -0.89 | -0.92 | 0.800 | 44.9% | +33 | — | — | 39.1% | -1.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.01 |
| 20 | 2003 | 1508 | 104.6 | -0.91 | +0.18 | 0.894 | 47.6% | — | +36 | — | 45.0% | -0.55 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.22 | 2006 | 1526 | 120.2 | +0.10 | -0.37 | 1.017 | 49.8% | +30 | -49 | — | 40.0% | -0.65 | 3–6 (33%) | 2–7 (22%) | 93.2 | -0.40 |
| 21 | 2004 | 1481 | 105.8 | -1.07 | -0.37 | 1.014 | 50.2% | +22 | -10 | — | 36.8% | -0.66 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.6 | +0.61 | 2007 | 1493 | 108.2 | -2.28 | -2.33 | 0.832 | 46.0% | +33 | — | — | 31.6% | -0.84 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.07 |
| 22 | 2005 | 1565 | 123.7 | -0.34 | -1.39 | 0.882 | 47.3% | -9 | -69 | — | 40.0% | -0.76 | 4–2 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.91 | 2008 | 1504 | 102.0 | +0.67 | +1.36 | 0.876 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.75 | — | — | — | -0.04 |
| 23 | 2006 | 1503 | 111.2 | -2.40 | -2.02 | 0.888 | 47.4% | +31 | +40 | -7 | 41.7% | -0.83 | 5–1 (83%) | 4–1 (80%) | 108.3 | +1.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 1464 | 106.2 | -2.66 | +0.61 | 0.991 | 49.5% | +24 | +54 | — | 41.7% | -0.58 | 2–8 (20%) | 2–1 (67%) | 94.5 | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 1484 | 103.8 | -4.12 | -0.06 | 0.877 | 47.1% | +9 | +29 | — | 48.0% | -0.24 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 100.6 | +0.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 1474 | 99.8 | -1.61 | -1.47 | 0.875 | 46.4% | +20 | — | — | 18.2% | -2.18 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 1451 | 99.0 | -3.11 | -3.04 | 0.632 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1664 | 112.6 | -2.39 | -0.89 | 0.906 | 47.7% | +18 | +18 | -7 | 40.2% | -0.76 | 16–19 (46%) | 12–10 (55%) | 101.6 | +1.32 | — | 1578 | 114.5 | -0.50 | -0.76 | 0.943 | 48.3% | +31 | -49 | — | 37.7% | -0.88 | 7–9 (44%) | 5–9 (36%) | 95.7 | -1.14 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 29, 2008 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 4, 2007 | H2H |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 13, 2006 | H2H |
| Emma Laine | 3 | 0 | 3 | Oct 12, 2006 | H2H |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 16, 2006 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Schruff | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 12, 2006 | H2H |
| Catalina Castano | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 29, 2007 | H2H |
| Elena Vesnina | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 21, 2006 | H2H |
| Gisela Dulko | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 28, 2006 | H2H |
| Mara Santangelo | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 14, 2006 | H2H |