H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Julie Harrington vs Catrin Jexell H2H: 2-0

Julie Harrington holds a 2–0 lead over Catrin Jexell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julie Harrington leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Harrington won the 1983 Honolulu round of 16 6-4 6-4.

H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Harrington 6-4 6-4 Catrin Jexell Match data Nov 11, 1983* R16 Honolulu WTA 250 Carpet
Julie Harrington 6-0 7-6 Catrin Jexell Match data Mar 3, 1983* R32 Palm Springs WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Harrington — #70 — 1,742 56 81 40.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Catrin Jexell — — — 1,737 46 62 42.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Harrington Catrin Jexell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
17 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,524 0 0 1980 6–4 60.0% — 1,545 0 0
18 1980 13–18 41.9% — 1,605 0 0 1981 6–7 46.2% — 1,544 0 0
19 1981 18–15 54.5% — 1,725 0 0 1982 14–8 63.6% — 1,661 0 1
20 1982 6–19 24.0% — 1,590 0 0 1983 12–17 41.4% — 1,649 0 1
21 1983 15–16 48.4% — 1,629 0 0 1984 5–15 25.0% — 1,537 0 1
22 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0 1985 3–8 27.3% — 1,491 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julie Harrington Catrin Jexell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1979 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
21 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 12 23 35 34.3% — 12 14 26 46.2% 25 25 50 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Harrington Catrin Jexell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1474 98.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.04
17 1979 1524 114.7 — — — — +97 — — 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.67 1980 1545 112.9 — — — — — +52 — 57.1% +0.33 1–0 1–1 — +0.33
18 1980 1606 124.5 — — — — -18 -23 -131 43.3% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.8 -0.77 1981 1545 105.9 — — — — — +72 — 46.9% -0.41 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 +1.02
19 1981 1726 127.8 — — — — +23 -106 — 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.6 +3.25 1982 1661 113.2 — — — — -97 +62 -47 60.8% +0.71 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +1.81
20 1982 1590 116.7 — — — — -34 +6 — 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.72 1983 1649 121.0 — — — — +20 +53 -105 43.8% -0.38 2–4 (33%) 2–6 (25%) 96.3 +0.97
21 1983 1630 115.7 — — — — +32 -33 — 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.38 1984 1537 103.3 — — — — +37 +102 — 27.9% -1.35 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.34
22 1984 1572 106.0 — — — — +13 — — 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.38 1985 1491 107.7 — — — — +103 +58 — 32.0% -0.96 1–2 (33%) — — +0.79
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1477 97.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.15
Career — 1743 124.2 — — — — +16 -29 -131 42.1% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +3.23 — 1737 114.5 — — — — +17 +68 -66 44.3% -0.39 12–16 (43%) 9–13 (41%) 95.4 +5.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.