H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Julie Harrington vs Joyce Portman H2H: 1-0

Julie Harrington holds a 1–0 lead over Joyce Portman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Harrington leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Julie Harrington won the 1981 Minneapolis round of 32 1-6 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julie Harrington
USA Age 64
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Joyce Portman
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Harrington 1-6 7-5 6-1 Joyce Portman Match data Oct 1, 1981* R32 Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Harrington — #70 — 1,742 56 81 40.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Joyce Portman — — — 1,650 17 30 36.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Harrington Joyce Portman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1980 13–18 41.9% — 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1981 18–15 54.5% — 1,725 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1982 6–19 24.0% — 1,590 0 0 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
21 1983 15–16 48.4% — 1,629 0 0 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
22 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0 1980 6–9 40.0% — 1,520 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1981 10–17 37.0% — 1,547 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,534 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julie Harrington Joyce Portman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1979 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 3 7 10 30.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 12 23 35 34.3% — 4 12 16 25.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Harrington Joyce Portman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1979 1524 114.7 — — — — +97 — — 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1980 1606 124.5 — — — — -18 -23 -131 43.3% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.8 -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 1726 127.8 — — — — +23 -106 — 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.6 +3.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 1590 116.7 — — — — -34 +6 — 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.72 1978 1485 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08
21 1983 1630 115.7 — — — — +32 -33 — 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.38 1979 1504 114.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — -0.10
22 1984 1572 106.0 — — — — +13 — — 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.38 1980 1521 109.4 — — — — -36 +64 — 44.1% -0.91 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.32
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1548 121.7 — — — — -64 +139 — 43.1% -0.41 1–6 (14%) 0–3 (0%) 92.6 +0.87
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1534 90.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.25 — — — -0.31
Career — 1743 124.2 — — — — +16 -29 -131 42.1% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +3.23 — 1650 115.9 — — — — -53 +125 — 41.2% -0.75 2–9 (18%) 1–4 (20%) 91.6 +0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.