H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Julie Harrington vs Kate Glancy H2H: 1-0

Julie Harrington holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Glancy in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Julie Harrington won the 1980 Kyoto round of 16 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julie Harrington
USA Age 64
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Glancy
CAN Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Harrington 6-1 6-2 Kate Glancy Match data Nov 16, 1980* R16 Kyoto WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Harrington #175 #70 — 1,741 55 80 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kate Glancy — — — 1,582 20 35 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Harrington Kate Glancy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1975 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
17 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,523 0 0 1977 1–3 25.0% — 1,459 0 0
18 1980 12–17 41.4% — 1,602 0 0 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,461 0 0
19 1981 18–15 54.5% — 1,724 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1982 6–19 24.0% — 1,589 0 0 1980 1–5 16.7% — 1,422 0 0
21 1983 15–16 48.4% — 1,629 0 0 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,423 0 0
22 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0 1982 14–15 48.3% — 1,455 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julie Harrington Kate Glancy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1979 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 11 22 33 33.3% — 4 10 14 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Harrington Kate Glancy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1492 95.3 — — — — — +24 — 33.3% -2.00 — — — +0.30
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1476 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.39
17 1979 1524 114.6 — — — — +97 — — 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.68 1977 1460 103.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 — — +0.25
18 1980 1602 125.8 — — — — -16 -20 -127 42.9% -0.17 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.7 -1.23 1978 1461 102.2 — — — — +124 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 — — +0.21
19 1981 1725 127.6 — — — — +24 -106 — 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.5 +2.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 1589 116.4 — — — — -34 +6 — 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.86 1980 1422 87.2 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.75 — — — +0.30
21 1983 1629 115.5 — — — — +33 -32 — 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.39 1981 1423 99.0 — — — — +111 — — 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — +0.44
22 1984 1571 105.9 — — — — +13 — — 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.33 1982 1455 107.3 — — — — +26 +101 — 46.2% -0.15 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.0 +3.49
Career — 1741 124.4 — — — — +18 -28 -127 42.0% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +2.61 — 1582 100.7 — — — — +69 +89 — 37.2% -0.95 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +9.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.