H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Julie Harrington vs Leigh Anne Thompson H2H: 0-1

Leigh Anne Thompson holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Harrington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leigh Anne Thompson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Leigh Anne Thompson won the 1982 Los Angeles round of 32 6-7 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julie Harrington
USA Age 64
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Leigh Anne Thompson
USA Age 62

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leigh Anne Thompson 6-7 6-1 6-1 Julie Harrington Match data Mar 4, 1982* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Harrington #175 #70 — 1,741 55 80 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Leigh Anne Thompson — — — 1,792 42 73 36.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Harrington Leigh Anne Thompson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,523 0 0 1981 4–5 44.4% — 1,542 0 0
18 1980 12–17 41.4% — 1,602 0 0 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,765 0 1
19 1981 18–15 54.5% — 1,724 0 0 1983 7–17 29.2% — 1,715 0 1
20 1982 6–19 24.0% — 1,589 0 0 1984 0–8 0.0% — 1,589 0 1
21 1983 15–16 48.4% — 1,629 0 0 1985 6–11 35.3% — 1,594 0 1
22 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0 1986 5–9 35.7% — 1,555 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julie Harrington Leigh Anne Thompson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1979 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 7 2 9 77.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
19 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 4 8 12 33.3%
20 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5% 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
Career — 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 11 22 33 33.3% — 16 25 41 39.0% 13 20 33 39.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 13 22 35 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Harrington Leigh Anne Thompson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1979 1524 114.6 — — — — +97 — — 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.68 1981 1543 110.4 — — — — +61 +27 — 47.6% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.41
18 1980 1602 125.8 — — — — -16 -20 -127 42.9% -0.17 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.7 -1.23 1982 1765 135.1 — — — — +1 -160 -227 45.7% -0.04 5–5 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.7 -0.61
19 1981 1725 127.6 — — — — +24 -106 — 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.5 +2.87 1983 1715 134.4 — — — — +4 -84 — 38.8% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 1–1 — -2.18
20 1982 1589 116.4 — — — — -34 +6 — 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.86 1984 1590 92.8 — — — — +12 -27 — 11.1% -2.33 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.15
21 1983 1629 115.5 — — — — +33 -32 — 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.39 1985 1594 115.3 — — — — +21 — — 36.8% -0.66 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.16
22 1984 1571 105.9 — — — — +13 — — 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.33 1986 1556 101.1 — — — — -8 -18 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 +1.93
Career — 1741 124.4 — — — — +18 -28 -127 42.0% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +2.61 — 1793 126.6 — — — — +9 -96 -227 40.5% -0.53 10–22 (31%) 9–13 (41%) 89.9 -0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.