H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Julie Harrington vs Stacy Margolin H2H: 1-1

Julie Harrington and Stacy Margolin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julie Harrington leads 1–0 on carpet, while Stacy Margolin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Harrington won the 1981 Los Angeles round of 32 6-4 5-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julie Harrington
USA Age 64
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Stacy Margolin
USA Age 67

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Harrington 6-4 5-7 7-5 Stacy Margolin Match data Mar 5, 1981* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Carpet
Stacy Margolin 6-2 7-6 Julie Harrington Match data Aug 20, 1980* R64 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Harrington #175 #70 — 1,741 55 80 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stacy Margolin — — — 1,854 73 99 42.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Harrington Stacy Margolin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,523 0 0 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 1
18 1980 12–17 41.4% — 1,602 0 0 1977 1–5 16.7% — 1,504 0 2
19 1981 18–15 54.5% — 1,724 0 0 1978 16–5 76.2% — 1,781 0 4
20 1982 6–19 24.0% — 1,589 0 0 1979 12–20 37.5% — 1,753 0 4
21 1983 15–16 48.4% — 1,629 0 0 1980 25–26 49.0% — 1,774 0 4
22 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0 1981 11–20 35.5% — 1,696 0 4
23 — — — — — — — 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,541 0 4
24 — — — — — — — 1983 2–5 28.6% — 1,518 0 4
25 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,512 0 4
26 — — — — — — — 1985 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julie Harrington Stacy Margolin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1979 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1976 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1978 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5% 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0%
21 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1980 14 7 21 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 14 23 39.1%
22 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 9 13 30.8%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 5 5 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 11 22 33 33.3% — 32 34 66 48.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 6 13 19 31.6% 25 36 61 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Harrington Stacy Margolin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1979 1524 114.6 — — — — +97 — — 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.68 1976 1524 94.1 — — — — +93 — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.93
18 1980 1602 125.8 — — — — -16 -20 -127 42.9% -0.17 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.7 -1.23 1977 1505 107.1 — — — — +54 — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–3 (0%) — +0.64
19 1981 1725 127.6 — — — — +24 -106 — 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.5 +2.87 1978 1781 145.4 — — — — -10 — — 68.8% +1.56 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — +0.02
20 1982 1589 116.4 — — — — -34 +6 — 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.86 1979 1753 143.1 — — — — -3 -222 -184 42.5% -0.05 2–7 (22%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 -0.85
21 1983 1629 115.5 — — — — +33 -32 — 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.39 1980 1775 142.4 — — — — -13 — -189 48.6% -0.01 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 101.2 -1.56
22 1984 1571 105.9 — — — — +13 — — 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.33 1981 1696 121.6 — — — — +33 -201 — 40.3% -1.19 3–7 (30%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 +0.05
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1542 96.6 — — — — +49 -85 +26 27.9% -1.70 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.55
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1519 103.3 — — — — +70 — +32 37.5% -0.81 0–2 0–1 — +0.45
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1512 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.14
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1480 92.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.25
Career — 1741 124.4 — — — — +18 -28 -127 42.0% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +2.61 — 1855 135.3 — — — — +9 -148 -86 44.5% -0.36 16–30 (35%) 11–19 (37%) 92.2 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.