H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Julie Harrington vs Stacy Margolin H2H: 1-1

Julie Harrington and Stacy Margolin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julie Harrington leads 1–0 on carpet, while Stacy Margolin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Harrington won the 1981 Los Angeles round of 32 6-4 5-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julie Harrington
USA Age 64
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Stacy Margolin
USA Age 67

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Harrington 6-4 5-7 7-5 Stacy Margolin Match data Mar 5, 1981* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Carpet
Stacy Margolin 6-2 7-6 Julie Harrington Match data Aug 20, 1980* R64 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Harrington — #70 — 1,742 56 81 40.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stacy Margolin — — — 1,856 74 100 42.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Harrington Stacy Margolin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,524 0 0 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 1
18 1980 13–18 41.9% — 1,605 0 0 1977 1–5 16.7% — 1,504 0 2
19 1981 18–15 54.5% — 1,725 0 0 1978 17–6 73.9% — 1,786 0 4
20 1982 6–19 24.0% — 1,590 0 0 1979 12–20 37.5% — 1,755 0 4
21 1983 15–16 48.4% — 1,629 0 0 1980 25–26 49.0% — 1,776 0 4
22 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0 1981 11–20 35.5% — 1,697 0 4
23 — — — — — — — 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,542 0 4
24 — — — — — — — 1983 2–5 28.6% — 1,519 0 4
25 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,513 0 4
26 — — — — — — — 1985 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julie Harrington Stacy Margolin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1979 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1976 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1978 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5% 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0%
21 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1980 14 7 21 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 14 23 39.1%
22 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 9 13 30.8%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 5 5 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 12 23 35 34.3% — 33 35 68 48.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 6 13 19 31.6% 25 36 61 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Harrington Stacy Margolin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1979 1524 114.7 — — — — +97 — — 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.67 1976 1524 94.1 — — — — +93 — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.95
18 1980 1606 124.5 — — — — -18 -23 -131 43.3% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.8 -0.77 1977 1505 107.2 — — — — +54 — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–3 (0%) — +0.64
19 1981 1726 127.8 — — — — +23 -106 — 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.6 +3.25 1978 1787 142.9 — — — — -14 — — 66.0% +1.36 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — +0.05
20 1982 1590 116.7 — — — — -34 +6 — 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.72 1979 1756 143.2 — — — — -5 -225 -186 42.5% -0.05 2–7 (22%) 1–4 (20%) 92.7 -0.76
21 1983 1630 115.7 — — — — +32 -33 — 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.38 1980 1777 143.0 — — — — -10 — -191 48.6% -0.01 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 101.4 -1.80
22 1984 1572 106.0 — — — — +13 — — 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.38 1981 1697 121.8 — — — — +33 -202 — 40.3% -1.19 3–7 (30%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 +0.04
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1543 96.7 — — — — +50 -86 +25 27.9% -1.70 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.62
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1519 103.4 — — — — +71 — +33 37.5% -0.81 0–2 0–1 — +0.45
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1513 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.15
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1481 92.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.25
Career — 1743 124.2 — — — — +16 -29 -131 42.1% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +3.23 — 1856 135.2 — — — — +9 -149 -88 44.5% -0.36 17–30 (36%) 11–19 (37%) 92.9 +0.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.