H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Julie Harrington vs Vicki Beggs H2H: 1-0

Julie Harrington holds a 1–0 lead over Vicki Beggs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Harrington leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Harrington won the 1980 Hong Kong Open round of 32 6-0 6-4.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Harrington 6-0 6-4 Vicki Beggs Match data Nov 6, 1980* R32 Hong Kong Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Harrington #175 #70 1,741 55 80 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Vicki Beggs 1,685 36 31 53.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Harrington Vicki Beggs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 1–1 50.0% 1,498 0 0
17 1979 3–6 33.3% 1,523 0 0
18 1980 12–17 41.4% 1,602 0 0
19 1981 18–15 54.5% 1,724 0 0
20 1982 6–19 24.0% 1,589 0 0 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,496 0 0
21 1983 15–16 48.4% 1,629 0 0
22 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0
23 1980 29–18 61.7% 1,608 0 1
24 1981 6–7 46.2% 1,577 0 1
26 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,568 0 1
27 1984 0–1 0.0% 1,549 0 1
28 1985 0–1 0.0% 1,531 0 1
29 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,515 0 1

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Harrington Vicki Beggs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1498 101.6 50.0% +0.50 +0.55
17 1979 1524 114.6 +97 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +0.68
18 1980 1602 125.8 -16 -20 -127 42.9% -0.17 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.7 -1.23
19 1981 1725 127.6 +24 -106 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.5 +2.87
20 1982 1589 116.4 -34 +6 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.86 1977 1497 108.3 0.0% -4.50 -0.39
21 1983 1629 115.5 +33 -32 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.39
22 1984 1571 105.9 +13 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) -0.33
23 1980 1609 117.5 +76 -70 60.8% +0.68 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 100.6 +4.84
24 1981 1577 108.3 48.1% +0.19 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) +0.03
26 1983 1568 93.1 0.0% -5.50 -0.12
27 1984 1549 96.5 0.0% -3.50 +0.20
28 1985 1531 96.5 0.0% -3.50 0.00
29 1986 1516 98.5 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 +0.14
Career 1741 124.4 +18 -28 -127 42.0% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +2.61 1686 112.9 +76 -70 54.0% +0.22 6–7 (46%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 +7.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.