H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julie Heldman vs Almut Sturm H2H: 1-0
Julie Heldman holds a 1–0 lead over Almut Sturm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Heldman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Heldman won the 1968 Munich semifinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 85
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1968* | Munich | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Julie Heldman | 6-3 6-3 | Almut Sturm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Heldman | — | — | — | 2,133 | 381 | 159 | 70.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 21 |
| Almut Sturm | — | — | — | 1,635 | 45 | 63 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Heldman | Almut Sturm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 53–15 | 77.9% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 74–17 | 81.3% | — | 2,020 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 29–12 | 70.7% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 32–26 | 55.2% | — | 1,958 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 68–31 | 68.7% | — | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | 1968 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1974 | 60–21 | 74.1% | — | 2,086 | 0 | 21 | 1969 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1975 | 24–14 | 63.2% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 21 | 1970 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 2 |