H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Julie Heldman vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 4-0
Julie Heldman holds a 4–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julie Heldman leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julie Heldman won the 1974 Newport third round 4-6 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 77
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1974* | Newport | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Julie Heldman | 4-6 6-4 6-0 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1974 | Toronto | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Julie Heldman | 6-0 6-3 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1972* | Columbus | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Julie Heldman | 6-2 6-4 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| Jun 5, 1969* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Julie Heldman | 6-0 6-0 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Heldman | — | — | — | 2,133 | 381 | 159 | 70.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 21 |
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Heldman | Raquel Giscafre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 53–15 | 77.9% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 74–17 | 81.3% | — | 2,020 | 0 | 14 | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 29–12 | 70.7% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 15 | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1971 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 16 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1972 | 32–26 | 55.2% | — | 1,958 | 0 | 16 | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1973 | 68–31 | 68.7% | — | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1974 | 60–21 | 74.1% | — | 2,086 | 0 | 21 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1975 | 24–14 | 63.2% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 21 | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 |