H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Julie Richardson vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 0-1

Nathalie Herreman holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Richardson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1988 Wichita round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julie Richardson
NZL Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #88 3-6 6-4 6-3 Julie Richardson #167 Match data Mar 3, 1988* R32 Wichita WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Richardson #643 #102 9 1,574 28 65 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Richardson Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1985 2–3 40.0% #145 1,505 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1986 1–7 12.5% #162 1,456 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1987 5–7 41.7% #157 1,480 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1988 12–15 44.4% #103 1,557 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1989 1–7 12.5% #257 1,507 0 0 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1990 5–7 41.7% #137 1,528 0 0 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1991 0–3 0.0% #556 1,504 0 0 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1992 1–8 11.1% #157 1,459 0 0 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1993 1–6 14.3% #301 1,411 0 0 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1994 0–2 0.0% #367 1,400 0 0 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julie Richardson Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1985 — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1987 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1988 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1989 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1990 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1992 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1993 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 19 41 60 31.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 17 26 34.6% 0 5 5 0.0% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Richardson Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1985 1506 109.6 — — — — — — +98 45.5% +0.09 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.50 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1986 1457 96.3 — — — — +67 — — 11.8% -2.65 1–0 0–1 — +0.40 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1987 1481 103.7 — — — — +21 — +115 41.4% -0.66 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.9 +1.02 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1988 1558 120.8 — — — — -12 — +44 45.8% -0.20 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 98.0 +1.35 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1989 1507 105.8 — — — — -9 — +69 21.1% -2.21 1–2 (33%) — — +0.02 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1990 1528 104.3 — — — — -8 — +52 44.0% -0.60 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.93 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1991 1504 101.0 — — — — -22 — — 0.0% -3.33 — 0–1 — -0.21 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1992 1460 107.6 — — — — -39 — +124 19.0% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 -0.25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1993 1411 93.4 — — — — -32 — — 21.4% -2.29 1–1 1–0 — +0.47 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1994 1400 94.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.09 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 1575 110.1 — — — — -5 — +83 33.5% -1.18 11–13 (46%) 8–15 (35%) 97.9 +4.45 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.