H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julie Richardson vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 1-0
Julie Richardson holds a 1–0 lead over Noelle Van Lottum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Richardson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Richardson won the 1993 Auckland third round 2-6 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 54
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1993* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Richardson | 2-6 6-3 7-6 | Noelle Van Lottum | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Richardson | #643 | #102 | 9 | 1,575 | 28 | 65 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Noelle Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,659 | 56 | 96 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julie Richardson | Noelle Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #162 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #157 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #103 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #257 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1990 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #137 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #556 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #157 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #301 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #367 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |