H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Justine Henin vs Amy Frazier H2H: 1-2
Amy Frazier holds a 2–1 lead over Justine Henin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2001 Toronto fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2001 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-3 6-2 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1999* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Amy Frazier | 7-5 6-4 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1999* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Amy Frazier | 3-6 7-6 7-5 | Justine Henin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
| Amy Frazier | #450 | #13 | 1,381 | 1,959 | 416 | 307 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Justine Henin | Amy Frazier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #58 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #33 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #19 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #39 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 | 1995 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 | 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,835 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 | 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 | 1998 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 | 1999 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 | 2001 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 | 2002 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #39 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #61 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #26 | 1,828 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,626 | 0 | 8 |