H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Justine Henin vs Aniko Kapros H2H: 1-1
Justine Henin and Aniko Kapros are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aniko Kapros leads 1–0 on clay, while Justine Henin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2003 US Open first round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 42
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Justine Henin | 7-5 6-3 | Aniko Kapros | Match data |
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Aniko Kapros | 4-6 6-1 6-0 | Justine Henin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
| Aniko Kapros | #1,173 | #45 | 722 | 1,691 | 35 | 40 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Justine Henin | Aniko Kapros | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #110 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #92 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #85 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #245 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |