H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Justine Henin vs Anke Huber H2H: 3-0
Justine Henin holds a 3–0 lead over Anke Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2001 WTA Tour Championships fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2001* | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-1 6-2 | Anke Huber | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2001* | Filderstadt | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-7(4) 6-2 7-5 | Anke Huber | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Justine Henin | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Anke Huber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Justine Henin | Anke Huber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |