H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Justine Henin vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 7-0

Justine Henin holds a 7–0 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2005 Roland Garros first round 6-0 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Justine Henin
BEL Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 25, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Justine Henin #12 6-0 4-6 6-4 Conchita Martínez #45 Match data
Apr 9, 2004* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Justine Henin #1 2-6 7-5 6-3 Conchita Martínez #25 Match data
Feb 28, 2004* Dubai WTA 500 QF Hard Justine Henin #1 6-1 6-0 Conchita Martínez #21 Match data
Jan 16, 2004* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Justine Henin #1 6-4 6-1 Conchita Martínez #16 Match data
Oct 10, 2003* Filderstadt WTA 500 R16 Hard Justine Henin #2 6-0 7-6(1) Conchita Martínez #14 Match data
Jan 10, 2002* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Justine Henin #7 6-0 6-3 Conchita Martínez #39 Match data
Jul 6, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Justine Henin #9 6-1 6-0 Conchita Martínez #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Justine Henin #13 #1 7,626 2,384 442 102 81.2% 7 10 2 18 5 42
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Justine Henin Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1999 11–6 64.7% #69 1,655 0 1 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 2000 17–13 56.7% #45 1,748 0 1 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 2001 56–18 75.7% #7 1,982 0 4 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 2002 50–21 70.4% #5 2,003 0 6 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 2003 73–11 86.9% #1 2,211 2 14 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 2004 30–4 88.2% #8 2,201 3 18 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 2005 34–5 87.2% #6 2,199 4 22 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2006 57–8 87.7% #1 2,276 5 28 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 2007 63–4 94.0% #1 2,373 7 38 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 2008 17–4 81.0% #1 2,278 7 40 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 — — — — — — — 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2010 32–7 82.1% #12 2,199 7 42 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2011 2–1 66.7% #13 2,173 7 42 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 — — — — — — — 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 — — — — — — — 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 — — — — — — — 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 — — — — — — — 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33