H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Justine Henin vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 3-1
Justine Henin holds a 3–1 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2002 Antwerp quarterfinal 7-6(1) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2002* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Justine Henin | 7-6(1) 6-1 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2001* | Nice | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Magdalena Maleeva | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2001* | Canberra | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-2 6-3 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2000* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Justine Henin | 6-4 7-6(4) | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Justine Henin | Magdalena Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |