H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Justine Henin vs Magui Serna H2H: 0-2
Magui Serna holds a 2–0 lead over Justine Henin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magui Serna leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magui Serna won the 2001 Scottsdale third round 7-6(5) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2001* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Magui Serna | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2000* | Knokke-Heist | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Magui Serna | 6-4 7-6(3) | Justine Henin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
| Magui Serna | #1,293 | #19 | 1,330 | 1,848 | 186 | 187 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Justine Henin | Magui Serna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #41 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #39 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 | 2000 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #37 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 | 2001 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 | 2002 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 | 2003 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,746 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #103 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #379 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |