H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Justine Henin vs Marlene Weingartner H2H: 1-0
Justine Henin holds a 1–0 lead over Marlene Weingartner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Justine Henin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2003 Miami fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2003* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-1 6-2 | Marlene Weingartner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
| Marlene Weingartner | #1,051 | #36 | 808 | 1,677 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Justine Henin | Marlene Weingartner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #87 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 | 2001 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #42 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 | 2003 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 | 2004 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #71 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 | 2005 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #381 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |