H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Justine Henin vs Mary Pierce H2H: 3-1

Justine Henin holds a 3–1 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2005 US Open fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Justine Henin
BEL Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 6, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mary Pierce #12 6-3 6-4 Justine Henin #7 Match data
Jun 4, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam F Clay Justine Henin #12 6-1 6-1 Mary Pierce #23 Match data
Jul 2, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Justine Henin #3 6-3 6-3 Mary Pierce #86 Match data
Apr 12, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 QF Clay Justine Henin #4 6-2 6-3 Mary Pierce #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Justine Henin #13 #1 7,626 2,384 442 102 81.2% 7 10 2 18 5 42
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Justine Henin Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1999 11–6 64.7% #69 1,655 0 1 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 2000 17–13 56.7% #45 1,748 0 1 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 2001 56–18 75.7% #7 1,982 0 4 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 2002 50–21 70.4% #5 2,003 0 6 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 2003 73–11 86.9% #1 2,211 2 14 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 2004 30–4 88.2% #8 2,201 3 18 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 2005 34–5 87.2% #6 2,199 4 22 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 2006 57–8 87.7% #1 2,276 5 28 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2007 63–4 94.0% #1 2,373 7 38 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2008 17–4 81.0% #1 2,278 7 40 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 — — — — — — — 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2010 32–7 82.1% #12 2,199 7 42 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2011 2–1 66.7% #13 2,173 7 42 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 — — — — — — — 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 — — — — — — — 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18