H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Justine Henin vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 2-1
Justine Henin holds a 2–1 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2006 Miami second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2006* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 7-5 6-4 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2004* | Dubai | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-4 6-2 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2001* | Gold Coast | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Justine Henin | Meghann Shaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |