H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Justine Henin vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 1-1
Justine Henin and Sabine Appelmans are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 1–0 on carpet, while Justine Henin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2000 New Haven third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 54
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2000* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-2 6-4 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1999* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Sabine Appelmans | 6-4 6-3 | Justine Henin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,923 | 279 | 202 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Justine Henin | Sabine Appelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 | 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 | 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 | 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 | 2000 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,685 | 0 | 7 |