H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Kaia Kanepi vs Francesca Schiavone H2H: 4-4

Kaia Kanepi and Francesca Schiavone are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Kaia Kanepi leads 4–2 on hard courts, while Francesca Schiavone leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2017 US Open first round 0-6 6-4 6-2.

EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 2017* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Kaia Kanepi #418 0-6 6-4 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #77 Match data
Jan 7, 2012* Brisbane WTA 500 SF Hard Kaia Kanepi #34 6-3 6-0 Francesca Schiavone #11 Match data
Oct 21, 2011* Moscow WTA 500 R16 Hard Kaia Kanepi #43 6-4 5-7 7-6(7) Francesca Schiavone #12 Match data
Jun 16, 2011* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Francesca Schiavone #7 7-6(7) 6-1 Kaia Kanepi #17 Match data
Oct 2, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Hard Francesca Schiavone #8 7-5 4-6 7-5 Kaia Kanepi #25 Match data
Jul 28, 2007* Bad Gastein WTA 500 SF Clay Francesca Schiavone #31 6-4 6-2 Kaia Kanepi #46 Match data
Nov 4, 2006* Hasselt WTA 500 QF Hard Kaia Kanepi #91 6-2 7-5 Francesca Schiavone #15 Match data
Oct 27, 2005* Hasselt WTA 500 R32 Hard Francesca Schiavone #15 6-3 6-4 Kaia Kanepi #121 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kaia Kanepi Francesca Schiavone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0
20 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0
21 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0
22 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0
23 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0
24 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0
25 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0
26 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0
27 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1
28 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1
29 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2
30 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4
31 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4
32 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5
33 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6
34 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6
35 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6
36 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7
37 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8
38 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8