H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kaia Kanepi vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 0-1

Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 1–0 lead over Kaia Kanepi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2006 Indian Wells Open round of 128 7-6(4) 6-1.

Estonia Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meghann Shaughnessy #85 7-6(4) 6-1 Kaia Kanepi #91 Match data Mar 7, 2006* R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,908 264 236 52.8% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kaia Kanepi Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #229 1,484 0 0 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,527 0 0 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0
21 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,606 0 0 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1
22 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,581 0 0 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2
23 2008 30–21 58.8% #27 1,761 0 0 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2
24 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,603 0 0 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3
25 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,842 0 1 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3
26 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,798 0 1 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3
27 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,861 0 3 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,838 0 4 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,719 0 4 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,659 0 4 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6
31 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,663 0 4
32 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,731 0 4
33 2018 12–12 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 2019 9–9 50.0% #101 1,761 0 4
35 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,729 0 4
36 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,699 0 4
37 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,802 0 4
38 2023 6–15 28.6% #168 1,627 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kaia Kanepi Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2002 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1997 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2005 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2006 8 8 16 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8%
23 2008 19 12 31 61.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2011 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 2012 13 6 19 68.4% 12 3 15 80.0% 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2014 12 12 24 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 1 8 9 11.1%
31 2016 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2017 4 2 6 66.7%
33 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
34 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
36 2021 10 8 18 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 2022 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
38 2023 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 156 134 290 53.8% 88 76 164 53.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 427/488 of Kaia Kanepi's and 94/240 of Meghann Shaughnessy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kaia Kanepi Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2006 5/30 3.2 3.6 50.1% 63.5% 51.7% 55.9% 43.1% 57.7% 43.7% —/—
22 2007 21/30 3.0 7.0 57.0% 65.6% 38.7% 49.4% 52.0% 54.0% 42.6% —/—
23 2008 37/51 2.4 5.1 58.3% 64.6% 45.9% 53.8% 50.1% 56.9% 45.8% —/—
24 2009 35/36 3.1 5.3 52.3% 64.9% 42.8% 47.9% 52.3% 54.2% 43.8% 2003 8/55 5.0 4.4 51.4% 71.2% 47.2% 53.9% 49.8% 59.4% 40.4%
25 2010 42/46 3.7 5.1 59.4% 68.5% 44.9% 53.1% 44.3% 59.0% 47.2% 2004 6/42 6.5 6.7 50.5% 72.4% 42.1% 59.3% 38.6% 57.5% 39.3%
26 2011 35/36 4.4 4.3 57.1% 67.9% 44.3% 58.6% 44.1% 57.8% 44.4% 2005 11/42 9.1 4.0 54.9% 77.0% 49.1% 57.4% 45.9% 64.4% 39.2%
27 2012 34/34 4.0 4.7 57.0% 70.7% 48.0% 55.5% 51.0% 61.0% 47.8% 2006 21/47 4.4 5.3 55.4% 68.5% 45.4% 54.3% 38.1% 57.9% 39.9%
28 2013 30/31 4.1 4.5 55.7% 69.5% 47.3% 59.5% 45.7% 59.5% 43.9% 2007 34/40 4.5 3.9 54.5% 70.0% 45.4% 56.8% 37.8% 58.6% 39.4%
29 2014 36/36 4.1 5.5 55.7% 65.5% 43.2% 50.9% 45.3% 55.4% 43.2% 2008 5/5 3.0 3.0 54.3% 56.9% 45.0% 58.1% 50.8% 51.2% 37.7%
30 2015 18/20 3.5 4.7 55.8% 66.6% 45.7% 55.4% 59.7% 57.3% 41.0% 2009 9/9 5.1 2.6 46.3% 64.4% 45.7% 49.6% 31.2% 54.0% 33.6%
31 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 65.3% 65.6% 11.8% 16.7% 100.0% 46.9% 38.7% —/—
32 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 71.5% 61.5% 44.5% 61.3% 43.3% 56.5% 42.1% —/—
33 2018 22/24 2.6 4.5 59.6% 64.2% 47.7% 53.3% 45.4% 57.7% 44.9% —/—
34 2019 18/18 3.5 4.7 58.4% 66.1% 42.5% 47.5% 39.9% 56.0% 44.6% —/—
35 2020 5/5 3.6 3.2 58.7% 62.0% 47.8% 41.4% 49.8% 56.5% 45.3% —/—
36 2021 22/23 3.7 4.6 51.7% 65.7% 46.8% 49.5% 54.1% 56.4% 41.5% —/—
37 2022 39/40 4.6 3.7 55.9% 68.5% 49.0% 49.4% 45.1% 59.7% 43.1% —/—
38 2023 21/21 2.5 3.1 57.0% 66.2% 46.9% 46.5% 42.8% 57.7% 40.7% —/—
Career 427/500 3.6 4.7 56.7% 66.8% 45.4% 52.4% 47.7% 57.5% 44.2% 94/466 5.2 4.2 53.4% 69.5% 45.8% 55.6% 39.9% 58.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kaia Kanepi Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1497 105.2 0.0% -2.50 -0.28
17 2002 1498 103.4 +23 40.0% -0.90 +0.03 1996 1512 107.9 +9 +65 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) +0.72
18 1997 1499 96.7 33.3% -2.33 0–1 +0.03
19 2004 1485 98.6 0.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.19 1998 1544 115.4 -48 +81 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 +0.65
20 2005 1527 114.1 +28 54.5% +0.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) -0.08 1999 1439 99.7 +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 93.7 +2.27
21 2006 1607 113.9 +0.07 -1.13 1.033 50.5% +4 -62 47.9% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +0.19 2000 1652 133.2 -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 +0.56
22 2007 1581 120.1 -1.50 -0.76 0.926 48.4% +17 +20 -16 46.5% -0.18 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 96.3 +0.10 2001 1832 151.0 -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) 110.5 +1.29
23 2008 1761 142.2 +1.74 +1.87 1.063 51.4% -2 -50 55.6% +0.40 13–9 (59%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.04 2002 1738 139.5 +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 94.1 +0.83
24 2009 1604 134.2 -0.69 +1.03 0.958 49.2% +69 +58 45.0% -0.20 4–8 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 89.0 +0.79 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 +1.17
25 2010 1842 146.9 +2.60 +3.18 1.151 53.0% -58 -100 -165 63.4% +0.93 3–8 (27%) 9–3 (75%) 101.4 -1.00 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +1.24
26 2011 1799 142.9 +1.95 +1.23 1.051 51.0% +49 -115 -218 50.6% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 3–6 (33%) 97.9 +0.49 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 94.8 +0.33
27 2012 1862 140.4 +3.77 +2.86 1.226 54.3% -34 -10 67.5% +1.30 7–2 (78%) 3–2 (60%) 104.5 +0.29 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 107.6 -1.20
28 2013 1838 132.3 +2.40 +0.55 1.085 51.8% -37 +75 -164 62.9% +0.74 6–2 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 +0.19 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.26
29 2014 1719 134.8 +0.25 +0.12 0.969 49.5% +38 +81 -56 48.9% -0.16 7–9 (44%) 9–4 (69%) 97.8 -0.89 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% +131 14.3% -2.86 0–1 -0.09
30 2015 1659 126.5 -0.20 +0.50 0.961 49.3% +51 +100 47.5% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 1–0 -0.35 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) -0.71
31 2016 1663 113.1 +1.02 -0.64 0.730 42.3% 0.0% -3.50 -0.02
32 2017 1732 125.4 -0.85 +0.35 0.969 49.3% +33 57.1% -0.14 2–0 +0.38
33 2018 1777 140.3 +1.23 +0.94 1.059 51.2% +67 -33 -156 54.7% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 93.5 -0.34
34 2019 1762 130.8 -0.84 +2.11 1.014 50.2% +14 +32 48.9% 0.00 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 102.0 -0.46
35 2020 1729 113.7 +0.66 +1.49 1.042 51.0% +2 41.7% +0.17 1–1 0–2 -0.21
36 2021 1700 135.8 +0.07 -0.08 0.950 49.1% +53 +14 44.0% -0.34 4–2 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.7 -1.55
37 2022 1802 144.9 +2.41 +0.90 1.071 51.2% +48 +6 -236 54.7% +0.25 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -0.84
38 2023 1627 124.3 +1.07 -1.99 0.962 49.0% +69 +54 38.0% -0.72 1–7 (13%) 2–8 (20%) 87.2 -0.08
Career 1909 143.0 +1.22 +1.05 1.039 50.8% +24 +4 -153 52.4% +0.17 85–88 (49%) 63–63 (50%) 96.4 -0.69 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.